Відео

Honestly I don't remember. I believe it was the same size as a Hobie 16 Spinnaker. Probably somewhere between 16-20 sqm. Pole length no idea. It was split as well for easier shipping and then connected in the center.

I can't 🥲

I'd say you're quite a bit faster on the downwind mostly because you can sail a deeper angle with more speed. The following applies to catamarans with asymmetric spinnakers (and in broader terms to many other boats with the same type of sail): With most boats you have the most power on a beam reach, when the boat is sailing perpendicular to the true wind angle. When hoisting the spinnaker or after a jibe you point the boat more to windward (from almost straight downwind). You will feel more power as you move closer to a beam reach. As the hull starts to lift you can hold your course. If a gust hits, you bear away to decrease the power and to not capsize. You trim the sail accordingly so that the luff of the spinnaker is almost collapsing but not quite. This results in mostly course changes to adapt to the gusts, lulls and shifts in the wind. I hope this helps. Downwind with the spinnaker is more about course changes than sail trim (though important as well). The main sail stays locked in tight to support the mast.

Hey, I got it from www.dartcatamarane.com/2018/03/20/dart-18-gennacker-kit/

The GoPro 😉

From what I've seen only one trapeze is race legal. However since I'm not racing and don't plan on racing national or above races with strict regulations I'm running twin trapeze wires. I've been double trapezing my Dart before. Mind you that when reaching you really need to shift your weight towards the back to keep the bow from dipping in too deep. I guess this is easier with the helm not trapezing and the crew right behind him. I'm not running a class legal rig anyway. It's a Forward Sailing rig with square top main.

Only single, double is for fun.

@@JanLeoKaak Ahoy There Jan-Leo Kaak San, and Warmest Heart-felt Aloha from Moloka'i Hawai'i, We are in the infant stage of the "start-up" for Our Community-at-Large Sailing School with (2) "old-beater/"Resurrected" 1978 Dart18 World boats; with Youth & Kapuna Church affiliation-n-collaborationbeing our focus. Our training trapeze system has (3) wires- (1) set-up for Adult racing / Fun Cruising mode; with (2) with lighter-weight childern training for logistics with A-sail Introduction as "Hybrid" function, and ease of Faster-than the Wind (FttW) high-performance Speed-Sailing Dynamic Screaming Fun (jmq) "Mesmerizing"Experiences-OK. Keep Pulling The Apparent, and Have a most Joyous "Surfilicious" Day (rks). aloha nui kakou jj i s~c P.S. Being that You are located in Germany, have You experienced Flying/Foiling with The E-Micheal Miller iFLY15 "Breakthru Flying Boat"...mahalo & arigato *DolFunHeart*

😎 soon bro 🙏

🤝❤

It's definitely a solid camera. The mark II has a couple useful features on top of that. Make sure to grab some decent ND filters and get some grading experience and LUTs. Also lots of batteries or external power.

so would you take this over the mark ii?

+John Landry The mark II has more features. The big argument for the original is price. Consider whether you need 4k. With the cash saved you could get filters/lenses

+Jan-Leo Kaak how does the slow motion and low light on the a7s compare to the mark ii. lighting situations for me are going to be a problem so thats why i was looking into the a7s

+John Landry There's plenty of info on either model on the internet. As far as I read the mark II improved upon both. Consider getting the mark one and some lights. You'll be a lot more flexible. Also lighting is more important than the camera you use.

+Jeff Moltenberry Well, my process was pretty much just grading everything in Speedgrade. I applied a LUT from either Osiris or Impulz and tweaked the clips to my liking. I ended up using multiple LUTs, I can't recall wich ones exactly

Blocked by UA-cam due to copyright I believe. Sorry :/

+João Lucas Silva Danke! ;)

Landon Kilhcuts No damage at all. I don't believe the tiny sparkles would do any harm. I'd be more afraid of the bigger blasts in the center ;)

👊👊

Everything was shot on either the Canon 50 f1.4 or the Canon 70-200 f4 IS using an $80 adapter from amazon

Jan-Leo Kaak AF or at least the aperture was working properly i suppose, wasnt it ?

Apeture works well in movie mode. If you re taking pictures in burst the First Frame is correctly exposed the following ones are overexposed

AF isnt any better than on the Mark 3 at least with my Adapter lens Combo. Accurate but takes forever. Continous af is Not supported

Jan-Leo Kaak overexposed as in way too much to be corrected ? thanks for the quick reply

Only the two firework shots are 120fps. The rest should be 60fps (40% on a 24fps timeline). I didn't notice a difference between FF and APS-C mode. Switched during the video a couple times I think. The video quality before UA-cam is a lot better of course.